Just got this email from our boys’ school
Just a gentle reminder to return the reply slips for the Biometrics registration as soon as possible please.
I understand that 6th form believe they do not need to register. This is not the case, all pupils need to return their slips and register.
The registration days will be held in the Sports Hall on Friday 2 December and Friday 9 December and further information on times etc. will come from form tutors in due course.
Thank you for your co-operation.
Provoked by this tweet, in which Daily Mail readers downvoted the comment “Say no to racism!” 2114 times (and upvoted it only 271 times), I was sceptical. This has to be a doctored screen-grab, I thought: who would deliberately downvote the uncontroversial idea of saying no to racism?
So I ran my own experiment: I registered a DailyMail.co.uk account as MichaelPTaylor (my real name) and started leaving the most uncontroversial compassionate comments I could think of on various articles. Here is one of the results:
Over on DanThinksAbout, in a discussion of the public and private sectors, Dan mentions the benefit of markets: that “competing firms innovate in the hope of getting ahead, and successful innovations make the firms that adopt them successful”. This left me thinking about the nature of competition, and of how it leads us to expend our effort. When it is beneficial?
When we think about competition in markets, we tend to think about Asus, Dell and Lenovo all competing to build better laptops at lower cost, and the resulting downward pressure on prices — which is obviously good for consumers.
We all have a good intuitive grasp for the value of a physical book. We grew up with them. We know roughly what they cost new (£5-15), what they cost in a second hand book-shop (about half that) and what you’d expect to pay in a charity shop (20p-£1).
We don’t really have a sense yet of what an e-book is worth. Continue reading
Here is a moral dilemma that I’ve not seen discussed before — maybe surprisingly, since it’s one that I imagine lots of us have run into. However I think through this, it leads me to a stupid conclusion. Can anyone help me to see what mistake I’m making?
For a long while — decades at least, I’ve had the impression the modern popular music is not as good as it was in the 60s, and indeed when I was growing up in the 70s or even the early 80s. What do I mean by “not as good”? I mean less melody, less harmony, less lyrical invention and most of all, a growing uniformity, where every song songs increasingly the same as every other song. Continue reading
Here is the well-known poem The Red Wheelbarrow, by William Carlos Williams:
so much depends
a red wheel
glazed with rain
beside the white
That’s the whole thing. The line-breaks are as in the original.