Led Zeppelin, Dazed and Confused (January 1969) — Heavy Metal timeline, part 7

And so, in part 7 of this series, we finally come to a group that are — at least sometimes — thought of as a heavy metal band. One of the Big Three, in fact, along with Deep Purple and Black Sabbath (and I don’t think it’s too much of a spoiler if I say that both of those will appear in this series). Here’s the stand-out track from the self-titled debut album: Dazed and Confused.

You can read Led Zeppelin in several ways. You can say that they brought a strong blues influence into heavy rock; but it’s probably more true to say that they started out by bringing a heavy rock sensibility into the blues. Their roots are largely in the blues, as the debut album makes clear (Babe I’m Gonna Leave You, You Shook Me, I Can’t Quit You Baby, etc.)

Zeppelin’s contribution was winding up the power and drama without sacrificing subtlety — not least through Robert Plant’s howling vocals, unprecedented at the time but now accepted as the base template for hard-rock singing. Comparing Plant’s vocals on Dazed and Confused to those on any of the first five entries on this timeline, the contrast is striking: Plant sings with a conviction and commitment that’s worlds apart from the earlier vocalists. The only comparable vocal in the list up to this point is Paul McCartney’s on Helter Skelter, released just two months before: but Led Zeppelin’s first album was recorded the month before the release of the White Album, so it can’t have been an influence on Plant.

To this passion and drive, they added instrumental virtuosity: Jimmy Page’s guitar work in particular is technically sensational — unsurprisingly as he had previously played in The Yardbirds, the same stable that had given us Jeff Beck and Eric Clapton (who I think is over-rated, but let it pass). On the drums, John Bonham is equally admired and iconic — not just for his speed, power and technique but also for the unique sounds of his drums, which have been widely sampled and reused.

Dazed and Confused opens with a simple descending bass over absolutely minimal drums, complemented by tangential guitar touches. After the first verse, the guitar begins doubling the bass pattern, then switching up to a howling register.

Where the song really comes alive is in the guitar attacks at the end of the verses, and then the violin-and-vocal-groan improvisation that follows the second of these. This leads into a frenzied instrumental jam with Plant’s voice wandering in and out seemingly at random, before a repeat of the guitar attacks leads us back into the final verse. It’s an assemblage of brilliantly executed parts that go together to make up something more.

But …

The elephant in the Led Zep Living Room is that they were outrageous serial plagiarisers, repeatedly claiming authorship of traditional songs and those written by other people. Dazed and Confused is itself an example of this: the song was written by Jake Holmes, who recorded his own version two years before. Jimmy Page saw him perform it in 1967, and added a cover version to the Yardbirds set. When he moved to Led Zeppelin, he took the song with him, and bizarrely claimed the writing credit. Admittedly Holmes’s performance is pretty weedy, and Zeppelin’s version absolutely blows it away; but that’s no reason to claim to have written the song. What’s wrong with just doing a brilliant cover version?

And there was plenty more of this kind of thing going on — a search for led zeppelin plagiarism turns up nearly 150,000 hits. Admittedly some of the accusations are far-fetched and opportunistic, but there’s a solid core of evidence regarding plenty of their songs. To my mind, this diminishes Led Zeppelin; that may be one reason why I’ve never quite been able to love them the way I love, say, Deep Purple. Still, whatever you conclude about their song-writing, there’s no denying the power and sheer conviction of their performances.

15 responses to “Led Zeppelin, Dazed and Confused (January 1969) — Heavy Metal timeline, part 7

  1. Pingback: MC5, Kick Out the Jams (February 1969) — Heavy Metal timeline, part 8 | The Reinvigorated Programmer

  2. Can’t help smiling at the »debug album« geek Freudian typo there.

    … and at Lep Zeppelin 👍👍👍

  3. Ha, well spotted! (Now fixed, sadly.)

  4. The interesting thing is that the Led Zeppelin arrangement is, other than Plant’s vocals, almost exactly the same arrangement as the Yardbirds had been using — https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rd_LmMpmWwM . It’s really only Plant’s vocal that makes it stand out as anything other than standard mod-psychedelia…

  5. Pingback: Deep Purple, Child in Time (June 1970) — Heavy Metal timeline, part 9 | The Reinvigorated Programmer

  6. Pingback: Black Sabbath, Paranoid (August 1970) — Heavy Metal timeline, part 10 | The Reinvigorated Programmer

  7. Pingback: Blue Öyster Cult, Workshop of the Telescopes (January 1972) — Heavy Metal timeline, part 10 | The Reinvigorated Programmer

  8. Pingback: Rush, Anthem (February 1975) — Heavy Metal timeline, part 12 | The Reinvigorated Programmer

  9. Pingback: Rainbow, Stargazer (May 1976) — Heavy Metal timeline, part 14 | The Reinvigorated Programmer

  10. Pingback: Scorpions, I Can’t Get Enough (February 1979) — Heavy Metal timeline, part 15 | The Reinvigorated Programmer

  11. Pingback: Iron Maiden, Phantom of the Opera (April 1980) — Heavy Metal timeline, part 16 | The Reinvigorated Programmer

  12. Pingback: Ozzy Ozbourne, Crazy Train (September 1980) — Heavy Metal timeline, part 19 | The Reinvigorated Programmer

  13. Pingback: Dream Theater, Under a Glass Moon (July 1992) — Heavy Metal timeline, part 22 | The Reinvigorated Programmer

  14. I’m sure everyone has seen the latest news about Zeppelin having to go to court over Stairway to Heaven:

    http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-04-12/led-zeppelin's-plant,-page-to-face-stairway-to-heaven-trial/7318612

    What’s been sadly unsurprising is that the journalists have apparently done zero research with the words “Zeppelin” or “plagiarism”, as they don’t seem to know it’s not a new subject. I’d argue it’s fair from the more egregious example of theirs either. Clearly no lunatic classic rock fans or guitar players among the people reporting on this.

    Should almost start a new post – what are the top 10 Zeppelin “creations”.

  15. Yes, I saw that — and despite loving Led Zeppelin, couldn’t deny that the Taurus people have a very legitimate case. It’s a shame, really. Why the Zep couldn’t just have given credit where it was due, I can’t explain. It’s not as though their own creative contribution was negligible!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s