Flesh and Stone (11th Doctor, episode 5)

[A revised and improved version of this essay appears in my book The Eleventh Doctor: a critical ramble through Matt Smith’s tenure in Doctor Who.]

So yesterday evening I watched Flesh and Stone, the second half of the two-parter that began with last week’s The Time of Angels, and the fifth outing for the new Doctor Matt Smith.  It had a lot to live up to: a very creepy opening episode featuring an enemy that has quickly become iconic — maybe more so than any Doctor Who creature outside of the Daleks and Cybermen.  Did it come up to expectation?

I dont know.

Of all the episodes I’ve seen, this is the one that I most need to watch again.  All the things that I expected to love about it — clever plotting, a resolution that makes sense, frightening monsters — seem a little hazy in my mind now; and I couldn’t really say, for example, how I feel about the angels themselves right now.  Does their development make them more interesting or less well-defined?  (Well, OK, obviously it does both; but which effect is stronger?)

But the dialogue and the acting, which I’d not particularly expected so much from, were outstanding.  Again and again as the episode progressed, I found myself taken by surprise by a clever insight or a moment of undiluted Doctorishness.  I laughed out loud a lot of times — not because it was particularly funny, but for the sheer joy of watching.  Matt Smith continues to push out ahead of the pack as my favourite Doctor, both fulfilling and transcending established characteristics of the role.  He continues to exude a mostly-calm intelligence, and is much more obviously analytical than his predecessor.  Much as I liked Tennant, I find I am already beginning to look back on his tenure as a little plasticky, a bit self-parodying; where he was painted in primary colours, Smith’s Doctor is subtler and richer.

Amy is also developing as a character (although see below).  I’ve only now realised how rare it is to see one of the Doctor’s companions truly scared, as she was last night.  And it was good to see: she should be scared.  Others have commented that Amy has seemed too breezy, too confident; as though she doesn’t understand or care what is at stake in her various adventures.  Last night, not so much.  She knew.

As is so often the case in Doctor Who, the frightening parts are not so much the attacks of the monsters as the unexpected ideas — such as people disappearing so thoroughly that they literally never existed.  Moffat is particularly strong on this kind of thing: remember Doctor Moon in Silence in the Library turning to Cal and telling her that her dreams are real and her real life is not?  These ideas, when stated baldly in a blog, may not be very spine-tingling; when presented in a coherent fiction, and acted convincingly, they surely are.  Flesh and Stone gave me several of these moments, and I love it for that — something that is pretty much unique to Who.

Oh, and the epilogue, back on Earth?  Put me down as Not A Fan.  I hope we’re going to see some specific exculpatory reason for Amy’s behaviour.  I’ve liked her a lot up till now; I don’t want to lose my respect for her.  The Doctor’s response suggested that something was Wrong there, and I hope it gets laid out for us.

On the positive side, at least Graham Norton wasn’t in it this time.

And so on to the rest of the season: the bad news is the the Grand Moff himself did not write any the next six episodes; the good news is that he wrote the final two-parter, in which I fully expect to see the Crack In The Universe again, and probably also see River Song killing The Best Man She Has Ever Known.  But first: vampires!  As always, I avoided seeing the trailer, so all I know is what’s in the title — that next week’s episode involves vampires and that they’re in Venice.  It’s by Toby Whithouse, whose previous story, School Reunion, I thought was pretty brilliant, although I know not everyone agrees on that.  I loved its treatment of Sarah Jane on her return, and especially Mickey’s realisation that he is the tin dog.  Now we’ll see what he does with vampires.

Half-term report

Five episodes in, now is a pretty good time to take stock of the new season.  Of those five, Moffat has written four (all but Victory of the Daleks), and of course has had overall control of the show, including the casting of Smith and Gillan as the Doctor and Amy.  How does the half-term report look?

It looks very, very good.  If I seem to have damned some of the episodes so far with faint praise — including Flesh and Stone, I suppose — it’s because I came into this season with very high expectations given Moffatt’s previous.  Those expectations may not have been exceeded, but neither have they been disappointed.  The new Doctor is outstanding, the plots are making more sense than at any previous time since the show was revived, and there are more spine-tingling moments than ever before — not fear exactly, but a sense of being close to something profound.

Most important of all, I am finding myself looking forward to each week’s episode with an eagerness I’ve not felt since 2005 (Christopher Eccleston’s season).  Each episode feels like an event — something I don’t want to miss (even though I know I’ll be able to download it within a couple of hours if I do).  The countdown to each Saturday’s episode is starting around the previous Tuesday.  My boys and their friends are playing Weeping Angels.  The monsters are iconic again.

There are, always have been, and always will be, things to dislike about Doctor Who.  There will always be a segment of the population that just refuses to like it.  But the deficiencies are easy to overlook this time around, and the many unique merits of the program are more apparent than ever.  I’m having a great time.

17 responses to “Flesh and Stone (11th Doctor, episode 5)

  1. I was also Not A Fan of Amy’s turn at the end of the episode – but then I found myself thinking that the mark of a good writer is not that they do what we like with the characters, but that they do what will make the story and the character better. That moment wasn’t out of character for Amy; for all her brilliance and courage, she’s still in some ways a childish and defensive person, who’s already shown herself to be capable of running to the other end of time and space to keep her escape options open. So I’m willing to trust Moffat that there’s a reason for it, especially if as you say, Something is Wrong :)
    Enjoyed the episode!

  2. Intuitively, I rather enjoyed the ending, just because of it’s nice wordplays. Although it appeared a bit constructed, I thought it was actually funny!

    And it fits, I think, with her as someone who also has been seen to be impulsive in the past. Having just come out of a major thrillride with her last adventure, a “bonding experience” with the doctor (having to trust him and all). Being just out of it, there is so much relief after having to control herself so strongly, she in contrast overdoes it and loses necessary self-control. Think thats a way they showed how much she had been under pressure!

    Although I hope, that they will have a good, clean solution to it. Just as I hope that I myself will, if I ever am in such a “it’s all over and I’m done” situation, manage to stay on top of things, and not doing something so stupid and shortsighted!

  3. I thought that part at the end was inkeeping with Amy’s character. I believe she’s fantasies about the Dr. since she was a little child, initially as the savour that was going to rescue her from a horrible childhood and as she got older that turned to desire. (In the first episode, the pictures and sculptures in her room).

  4. Why do we let the doctor get away with writing an omniplatform computer virus in ten seconds on a cellphone with a screwdriver?

  5. zach m, I agree that the computer virus was the weakest element of the new series so far; and it’s a shame that it was a key plot point in the very first episode. I think it’s part of the reason that my initial response to the new series was much less wholeheartedly positive than my reaction to subsequent episodes. It felt a lot more like an RTD idea than a Moffatt one … I almost wonder whether Davies did come up with it, and bequeathed it to his successor, who felt it would be churlish not to use it. Same applies to the Doctor’s arrival at the hospital by climbing up the fire engine’s ladder through the window — it felt knockabout, slapstick, not at all Doctorish.

    And, therefore, very different from Flesh and Stone. One of the aspects of the new series that I love is that, the first episode aside, the new Doctor is never frivolous. Unpredictable, yes, eccentric, yes, but I’ve not seen him behave as though what’s happening doesn’t matter — he’s never undercut the significance of the unfolding story by treating it as a game. Except in that first episode. So I think it really was transitional.

  6. I’m really sorry to say this but I’m with Terry Pratchett on this one.

  7. And what is Terry Pratchett’s opinion?

  8. Ah, OK, I have it: for anyone else who’s not seen it here is Terry Pratchett on New Who.

    I’m not sure I would have given this the time of day if it had been written by someone without name recognition. Anyone claiming that Torchwood is better then Who is not living on the same planet as me. (I will be doing a Train Wreck post on Torchwood soon, so I won’t bother taking it apart in this comment.) It’s particularly bizarre to hold up Small Worlds as a good example, as in that episode the Torchwood team achieve: nothing at all. They might just as well not have been in it at all.

    Pratchett says, quite rightly:

    A decent detective story provides you with enough tantalising information to allow you to make a stab at a solution before the famous detective struts his stuff in the library. Doctor Who replaces this with speed, fast talking, and what appears to be that wonderful element “makeitupasyougalongeum”

    That’s been one of the series’ biggest weaknesses for sure; David Tennant’s habit of sayingitveryveryfastandhopingthatmasksit never helped. But the absence of that is precisely what I am enjoying most about the current season. He seems to be criticising Last Year’s Who. I wonder whether the article was commissioned in 2009 and only cursorily updated for its recent eventual publication?

  9. Pingback: The Vampires of Venice (11th Doctor, episode 6) « The Reinvigorated Programmer

  10. I am ok with the Amy moment in the end. I don’t see anything wrong with it. In fact, it felt almost a natural development for this character.

    Seems like what a young modern girl would do. And she had been dreaming about the Doctor all her life, and now having had such adventures with him and just got out of a life and death situation, this seems like the sort of thing she’d do.

  11. Pingback: The Hungry Earth (11th Doctor, episode 8) « The Reinvigorated Programmer

  12. Pingback: What’s in the box? « The Reinvigorated Programmer

  13. Pingback: The Big Bang (11th Doctor, episode 13) « The Reinvigorated Programmer

  14. Pingback: Let’s Kill Hitler (Doctor Who series 6, episode 8) | The Reinvigorated Programmer

  15. Pingback: The Wedding of River Song (Doctor Who series 6, episode 13) | The Reinvigorated Programmer

  16. Pingback: The Bells of Saint John (Doctor Who series 7, episode 7) | The Reinvigorated Programmer

  17. Pingback: Oh, Doctor! How are you going to get out of this one? (The Magician’s Apprentice) | The Reinvigorated Programmer

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s