Well, I certainly didn’t expect that.
I wanted to post within minutes of the end of the episode. I was going to entitle my article “The Impossible Astronaut: First Impressions”, and the entire article would consist of the following:
I don’t think I have ever felt so at sea during a Doctor Who, certainly not a season opener. With Rose, New Earth, Smith and Jones, Partners in Crime and indeed The Eleventh Hour, we got nice, simple, self-contained stories that anyone coming in cold would be able to easily follow. Not so this time: it was hugely complicated, multi-stranded, truly frightening in places, and absolutely not self-contained. It’s not just that it’s the first half of a two-parter, but one that leaves many, many questions unresolved. (I’d like to list them here, but I am trying not to be spoily.)
I’m not quite sure what I think about that. It’s certainly courageous, but is it so in the vanilla sense of the word or in Sir Humphrey Appleby’s sense? Can it be wise to throw new viewers straight into so deep a deep end? Or are we now working on the assumption that there won’t be a lot of new viewers by this stage, that the programme’s captured everyone it’s going to? If nothing else, it does indicate a huge degree of confidence on the part of the programme makers: both self-confidence, that they believe they can pull it off, and maybe more importantly confidence in their audience, that they can cope. That, I like. And there is, to be fair, something invigorating about awaiting a the second half of a story and having almost no idea what it’s going to contain.
So while I wait for the actual story to settle down and start making sense next week, what I am left with this week is a blur of individual moments, most of them delicious. If the the episode is more of a smörgåsbord than a square meal, it’s a good smörgåsbord. More than once in reviewing Series 5, I used the word “audacity” (The Beast Below, The Big Bang), and I’ve found myself coming back to that property of the programme again and again while discussing it with people. It’s a quality that seemed to increase throughout Series 5 and continue into the Christmas special, and it’s certainly not fading away as we begin on Series 6.
I’ll just mention a couple of instances.
- The Casanova introduction, surely a knowing nod to predecessor David Tennant’s earlier role as that character.
- The Doctor waving cheerfully at Amy and Rory, unnoticed, from a Laurel and Hardy film.
- “I wear a stetson now. Stetsons are cool.” Would have been funny even without the fez line from The Big Bang.
- Rory’s rueful resignation to his job of babysitting Delaware through his first-time-in-the-TARDIS culture-shock.
- The Doctor silently gesturing for Nixon and Canton Delaware to continue their discussion when they finally turn to notice him there, assiduously taking notes.
What does all this mean for the series? It’s hard to tell this early, but one thing is clear: Doctor Who is not out to dumb things down for its viewers. I imagine editorial meetings where Moffat outlined the plans, people told him “That’s too complicated, people won’t follow”, and he just refused to accept it. Right or wrong? In the Big Brother/X-Factor/Who Wants To Be A Millionaire? era, for my money it’s better to err on the side of asking too much of an audience than too little. I like it that Doctor Who is throwing so very much at the wall and seeing what sticks, and I love it that it trusts us enough to make sense of it all.
Special bonus observation
The moment I saw the scene where the Doctor meets the eponymous astronaut:
It hit me like a truck that I was looking at a re-creation of the cover art from Pink Floyd’s awesome Wish You Were Here album. If you’re not familar with that album then (A) what the heck have you been listening to all your life? And (B) here is the front cover, with the two men in lateral view shaking hands, and the back cover with the lake:
I wonder whether it’s deliberate? A quick bit of googling suggests that no-one else has yet picked up on it, so maybe it’s just a coincidence. But for me, loving that album as I do, the visual allusion introduced another layer of poignancy to what was already a very surreal scene.
Update (Monday 25th April)
Two more Impossible Astronaut reviews, by people whose writing I like and which have some good insights: Andrew Hickey; and Gavin Burrows, with a short followup that makes an excellent point. No word yet from Andrew Rilstone.